Sample Questionaire for Feedback from Students Questionaire 1 State University of Malang


Sample Questionaire for Feedback from Students
Questionaire 1
State University of Malang
Programme:
Departmnet:                                                                Semester/Term/Year:
Students are required to rate the courses on the following atributes using the 4 point scale shown. The format given is for one course. Do same for other course on separate page.
Course 1:
Parameters
A
Very Good
B
Good
C
Satisfactory
D
Unsatisfactory
1. Depth  of  the  course  content
including project work if any
2. Extent of coverage of course
3. Applicability/relevance  to  real
life situations
4. Learning  value  (in  terms  of 
knowledge,  concepts,  manual
skills,  analytical  abilities  and
broadening perspectives)
5. Clarity and relevance of textual
reading material
6. Relevance  of  additional  source
material (Library)
7. Extent  of  effort  required  by
students
  8.     Overall rating





Questionaire No.2
State University of Malang
Students Feedback on Teachers (Separate for each Teacher)
Department:                                                                Semester/Term/Year:
Please rate the teacher on the following attributes using the 4point scale down
Name of the Teacher:
Parameters
A
Very Good
B
Good
C
Satisfactory
D
Unsatisfactory

1. Knowledge  base  of  the  teacher  (as
perceived by you)
2. Communication  Skills   (in  terms  of
articulation  and  comprehensibility)
3.Sincerity / Commitment of the teacher
4. Interest generated by the teacher
5. Ability to integrate  course  material  with environment/other  issues,  to  provide  abroader perspective
6. Ability  to  integrate  content  with  other courses
7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out of
the  class  (includes  availability  of  the
teacher  to  motivate  further  study  and
discussion outside class)
8. Ability  to  design  quizzes  /Tests
/assignments  /  examinations and projects
to evaluate students understanding of the
course
9. Provision of sufficient time for feedback
10.  Overall rating





Questionnaire No. 3
State University of Malang
Students’ overall Evaluation of Programme and Teaching
(To be filled only after Results are out)
Department   :                                                 Course  :         
Teacher         :                                                  Year     :  
Your responses will be seen only after your course results have been finalised and recorded.
The information will be used only for the improvement of the course and teaching in the future.
You need not disclose your name if you do not wish to.
You may tick off more than one answer to a question to the extent that it does not invalidate your
response.

1. The syllabus was
a) challenging b) dull
c) adequate d) inadequate
2. Your background for benefiting from the course was
a) more than adequate b) just adequate
c) inadequate d)   cannot say
3. Was the course conceptually difficult to understand?
a) easy b) manageable
c) difficult d) very difficult
4.   How much of the syllabus was covered in class?
a) 85 to 100% b) 70 to 85%
c) 55 to 70% d) less than 55%
5. What is your opinion about the library materials for the course?
a) excellent b) adequate
c) inadequate       d) very poor
6.  Were you able to get the prescribed readings?
a) easily b) with difficulty
c) not at all d)  with great difficulty
7.  How well did the teacher prepare for class?
a) thoroughly b) satisfactorily
c) poorly d) indifferently
8. How well was the teacher able to communicate?
a) effectively b) invariably
c) satisfactorily d) badly
9. Did the teacher encourage student participation in class?
a) yes b) attempted
c) not at all d)   sometimes
10. If yes, which of the following methods were used?
a) encouraged questions b) discussion in class
c) discussion outside class d)   discussion individually
11. How helpful was the teacher in advising?
a) helpful b)  unhelpful
c) sometimes helpful d) sometimes unhelpful
12. Was the teacher
a) courteous b) rude
c) indifferent d)   strict
13. Did the internal assessment work?
a) fairly b) regularly
c) helpfully d)   cannot say
14. What effect do you think the internal assessment will have on your course grade?
a) improve it b) lower it
c) no effect d)   cannot say
15. How did the teacher provide feedback on your performance?
a) regularly/irregularly b) in time/late
c) with helpful comments d)   without comments
16. Were your assignments discussed with you?
a)  yes, fully b) yes, partly
c)   no d)   sometimes
17. Were you provided with a course and lecture outline at the beginning?
a) yes b) no
18. Was it helpful?
a) yes b) no
19. Was it followed?
a) yes b) no
20. Was there any opportunity for personal interaction with teachers?
a) Yes        b) to some extent
c) nil d) cannot say
21. Was there any opportunity for small group work?
a) Yes        b) to some external
c) nil d)  cannot say
22. Were outsider experts invited to address you?
a) Yes        b) rarely
c) none d)  frequently
23. Did you visit industries, laboratories, banks and outside Universities/
a) Ye, frequently b) some times
c) no d) yes, rarely
24. If you have other comments to offer on the course and the instructor you may do so below or on a
separate sheet.


0 comments:

Post a Comment